AI in the Workplace: Why Human Judgment Still Matters

By Bradly Howland 

CEO, Alkemi Collective 

 

A few months ago, one of my team leads submitted a first draft of a client strategy document in under two hours. It was polished, well-structured, and covered all the expected ground. It was also, on closer reading, almost entirely generic. The AI had done its job. The thinking had not. 

 

That moment sits with me, because it captures something the industry is not yet being honest enough about. Artificial intelligence has not simply made us more efficient. It has changed what efficiency means… and in doing so, it has created a new and underappreciated risk: that we begin to mistake fluency for insight. 

 

The productivity gains from AI are real

The productivity numbers are real. Research from MIT and Harvard Business School consistently shows that AI-assisted knowledge workers complete tasks 20% to 35% faster, often with measurable quality improvements. Across the communications and marketing industry, output volumes have surged. Agencies that once needed teams to produce a content campaign can now do it with a fraction of the headcount. Clients are asking for more, faster, and at lower cost. The market is obliging. 

 

However, here is the argument I want to make and I accept it may be unpopular in some boardrooms: the productivity gains from AI are real, but they are also creating a form of output inflation that we are not yet equipped to manage. 

 

The Hidden Cost of AI Productivity

Output inflation works like this. As the cost of producing work drops, so does its perceived value. When content is abundant and cheap to generate, differentiation becomes harder. The premium shifts away from production capability and towards something far more difficult to automate: judgment, interpretation, and the ability to navigate genuine complexity. Yet the commercial pressure is moving in exactly the opposite direction. More deliverables. Faster turnaround. Shorter thinking cycles. 

This is not a technology problem. It is a leadership problem. 

 

Organisations embedding AI into their workflows are making implicit choices about what they value. If the metric is speed and volume, then depth and originality will be quietly deprioritised. Nobody announces this. It simply happens, gradually, as the incentive structure shifts. Over time, it hollows out the very capability that justified the premium in the first place. 

 

AI adoption in South Africa

In South Africa, this dynamic carries an additional layer of complexity. AI adoption is uneven - not just across industries, but within them. Some organisations are accelerating rapidly, deploying tools across research, content, and client service. Others are still building foundational digital infrastructure. The result is a dual pressure: to catch up quickly, often without the governance frameworks or strategic clarity needed to do so responsibly. 

 

The risk of moving fast without that clarity is not only reputational, it is also structural. An organisation that uses AI to replace thinking, rather than to enhance it, is not becoming more competitive. It is becoming more fragile, dependent on tools it does not fully understand, producing work that is difficult to defend when it matters. 

 

What AI means for communications

For the communications industry specifically, this should prompt some uncomfortable self-examination. Our value proposition has never been rooted in volume. It lies in the capacity to read a situation accurately, to shape a narrative under pressure, to exercise judgment when the facts are contested and the stakes are high. These are not capabilities that can be automated. But they can be eroded - through neglect, through underinvestment, and through the slow substitution of speed for thought. 

 

The organisations that will succeed in this next phase are not those that use AI most aggressively. They are those that are most deliberate about where it stops. 

 

That means protecting time for thinking, even when technology makes it possible to move faster. It means being explicit about where human judgment is non-negotiable, and building that distinction into how work is structured, priced, and evaluated. It means resisting the temptation to let a client brief become a prompt, and then mistake the output for a strategy. 

 

AI has made work faster. Whether it makes work better depends entirely on the choices that sit around it - the questions we ask before we run the tool, the standards we apply when we review the output, and the intellectual honesty to know the difference between something that looks good and something that is good. 

 

Speed is not the test. Judgment is. 

 

Howland is the CEO of Alkemi Collective and President of the Public Relations Institute of Southern Africa (PRISA). 

G20 Lessons for Marketing, Media and Reputation Leadership

By Bradly Howland 

CEO: Alkemi Collective 

 

South Africa’s hosting of the G20 Summit in 2025 wasn’t just a diplomatic milestone. It was a live, high-stakes demonstration of what strategic communication looks like when the stakes are global, the audience is fragmented, and the entire world is refreshing their news feeds for the next headline. 

 

For those of us working in marketing, media, and professional communications, the summit delivered a masterclass. These G20 marketing lessons are surprisingly transferable to the boardroom, the campaign war room, and the brands we build daily.

 

Below are the five non-negotiable insights that stood out most, not from a political lens, but from a communications leadership perspective. 

 

 

  1. Africa took control of its own narrative: The power of pre-framing.

 

One of the biggest strategic wins of G20 Johannesburg was how intentionally South Africa, as the first African host, shaped the narrative before anyone else could. Analysts and global media often arrive with "pre-loaded assumptions" about Africa, assumptions that, if left unchallenged, become the default story. 

 

South Africa didn’t wait for external validation. It proactively framed the summit around a powerful, values-driven theme: Solidarity, Equality, and Sustainability. This was more than a slogan; it was a narrative filter. It ensured every discussion, from debt relief to climate finance and global wealth inequality, was interpreted through the lens of the Global South’s priorities and a distinctly African voice.  

 

Furthermore, the early adoption of the Leaders’ Declaration, a move celebrated by many nations but reportedly opposed by the US, sent an immediate, decisive message about the host's agenda-setting power and multilateral consensus. 

 

Marketing Takeaway: 

 

  1. Integrated communication works: internal & external must align

 

A standout element was how seamlessly domestic communication and global communication were integrated.  

 

The government didn't just speak to foreign media; they spoke to South Africans in communities, on social platforms, and through outreach programmes like the establishment of the Township20 (TS20) engagement group.  

 

The goal was clearly: “Let South Africans understand the G20’s relevance and let the world hear the voices and priorities of all South Africans.” 

 

This deep, concerted effort secured an essential social licence for the event. By the time the summit kicked off, citizens were talking about it with a sense of ownership, not distance or apathy. This internal buy-in became a protective shield, allowing the hosts to focus on the external narrative while maintaining national cohesion. 

 

Marketing Takeaway:

 

  1. The M20 Media Summit elevated information integrity to a global strategic imperative

 

The M20 Media Summit, convened by the South African National Editors’ Forum (SANEF) and Media Monitoring Africa (MMA), was not a side-show, but a powerful, proactive call to action. African media leaders successfully tabled the Johannesburg Declaration, and its formal handover to President Ramaphosa ahead of the main summit cemented its standing as a major agenda point. 

 

The M20 Declaration fundamentally framed Information Integrity as essential to democracy, development, and the achievement of the G20’s goals. 

 

Key planks of this declaration were: 

 

Marketing & Media Takeaway: 

 

  1. Complex crises can be turned into reputation wins

 

The summit wasn’t without dramatic tensions: the glaring absence of a major G20 leader (the US), geopolitical conflicts dominating headlines, and relentless online noise were real threats to the host's success. Yet, South Africa's communication response was a study in narrative discipline. 

 

Instead of reacting defensively to the US boycott or allowing the absence to derail the talks, the hosts calmly reframed the story. The narrative became: "Multilateralism still works, with or without certain powers." The early adoption of the Declaration in the face of opposition reinforced a confident stance, allowing objective progress, the focus on the Global South agenda, climate finance, and debt relief, to replace political theatre as the main story. This pivot turned a potential crisis into a proof point for the strength of the collective and the host's strategic resolve. 

 

Marketing Takeaway: 

 

  1. The world responds to consistency and professional rigour

 

Perhaps the most important lesson for our industry is that the success was not accidental. South Africa didn’t improvise its way to a strong outcome. Every element, from the core messaging, the high standard of the media centre experience, the social sentiment tracking, the community dialogue, and the aligned leadership narratives, was part of a coordinated, professional effort. 

 

That consistency is why the payoff was so big: renewed international respect, stronger national pride, better-informed global audiences, and global recognition for Africa’s communication maturity. The seamlessness of the operation, widely lauded by the media, reinforced the credibility of the entire agenda. 

 

Marketing Takeaway: 

 

The formula for building value remains the same, whether you're running a global summit or launching a new consumer brand: 

 

The bottom line? 

 

The G20 was a potent reminder that communication is not window dressing; it is a strategic asset and a source of competitive advantage. It also confirmed that Africa is not a passive participant in global storytelling; we are increasingly a co-author of the global narrative. This requires communicators who can work with cultural intelligence, data, creativity, and professional discipline. 

 

As we continue our work of raising professional standards, strengthening narrative leadership, and championing ethical communication, the G20 stands as proof that South Africa can communicate at a world-class level, with world-shaping impact. Our industry should take that momentum seriously and build on it loudly, proudly, and intentionally. The world is clearly still listening, and we have the capacity to lead the narrative.